Guest ssj4gogita4 Posted July 14, 2013 Posted July 14, 2013 ATTN SBC & SBC XAT GOERS: It has come to the attention of some of the staff that the number of unregistered members has increased. For example, a few of sbc forum users have 4-5 different accounts on xat. With so many unregistered xat users, this can become increasingly a nightmare because neither owner, nor mod, will know who is really who. Therefore, the 'Loyal Customers' have voted that the following be put into action, effective today: 1. Register for xat account before August 1, 2013. (click here to register) 2. If you are not registered before August 1, 2013, you will be banned for the 3-step process. (24, 48, perma) 3. After each chance to re-consider registering a username on xat, the next step in banning will commence. After the 3rd time, you will be perma-banned.
Burgerpants Posted July 14, 2013 Posted July 14, 2013 Well, what happens if someone signs after Augest 1?
SpongeOddFan Posted July 14, 2013 Posted July 14, 2013 Well, what happens if someone signs after Augest 1? then you'll be banned by ssj
crushingmayhem Posted July 14, 2013 Posted July 14, 2013 Finally we have some control over who gets to be in xat. It's always confusing knowing who's who on the xat, but with the implementation of this rule it should be easier from here on.
jdfr03 Posted July 14, 2013 Posted July 14, 2013 NOT FAIR! I CAN'T GO ON XAT! (EVEN THOUGH I HAVE AN ACCOUNT)
Jjs Goodman Posted July 14, 2013 Posted July 14, 2013 NOT FAIR! I CAN'T GO ON XAT! (EVEN THOUGH I HAVE AN ACCOUNT) But...if you aren't on the xat to begin with, there's nothing to worry about. o__O
jdfr03 Posted July 14, 2013 Posted July 14, 2013 But...if you aren't on the xat to begin with, there's nothing to worry about. o__OThere is. I'll be banned.
Jjs Goodman Posted July 14, 2013 Posted July 14, 2013 There is. I'll be banned. He means for people currently on the xat.
Elastic Dawg Posted July 14, 2013 Posted July 14, 2013 This is a pointless load of steaming horsecrap, but i'll comply. It's not like imposters are gonna kill/ruin the xat, but whatever.
Jjs Goodman Posted July 14, 2013 Posted July 14, 2013 This is a pointless load of steaming horsecrap, but i'll comply. It's not like imposters are gonna kill/ruin the xat, but whatever. It's not fun when 99% of the people entering are under some shady name and "act all mysterious and claim to be someone we know", because it stopped being funny ages ago. 3
Elastic Dawg Posted July 14, 2013 Posted July 14, 2013 BTW, i'm trying to do that and I can't. This too. Xat accounts are frustrating as crap (lolcensorship) to make and don't work properly half the time. Honestly, it'd be way easier if we just punished imposters as opposed to making the whole community suffer for what the majority of us don't do. But that's just silly ol' me. 3
Elastic Dawg Posted July 14, 2013 Posted July 14, 2013 It's not fun when 99% of the people entering are under some shady name and "act all mysterious and claim to be someone we know", because it stopped being funny ages ago. Sorry for double posting (on mobile, ugh), but while I do agree, uh, just read my response to spongelover.
SpongeOddFan Posted July 14, 2013 Posted July 14, 2013 It's not fun when 99% of the people entering are under some shady name and "act all mysterious and claim to be someone we know", because it stopped being funny ages ago. summer 2012 says hi.
So Sejima Posted July 14, 2013 Posted July 14, 2013 I don't find this necessary at all. I mean you could ban a REAL member by accident who hasn't been on xat recently which logs out their account and for some reason xat wont send you an email for a loss password. So yeah this would just be worse we're fine as it is now.
Macseed Posted July 14, 2013 Posted July 14, 2013 Lol I brought this idea up months ago and now it's happening.
Recommended Posts